Appendix A: Standardization, Reliability, and Validity Tables
Table A.26. Correlations between EQ-i 2.0 and Watson-Glaser II Critical Thinking Appraisal
The following table illustrates correlations between the EQ-i 2.0 Total EI score, composite scales, and subscales, and the Watson-Glaser II Critical Thinking Appraisal. Values range from -1.00 to +1.00; values close to -1.00 represent an inverse relationship between scores on the two scales, values close to +1.00 represent a direct relationship, and values close to zero represent a lack of a relationship. For most Watson-Glaser II scales (see Standardization, Reliability, and Validity), the correlations close to zero found between most of the Watson-Glaser II scales (see Standardization, Reliability, and Validity) and the EQ-i 2.0 support the validity of the EQ-i 2.0.
EQ-i 2.0 Scale |
Watson-Glaser II Critical Thinking Appraisal Scale | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Recognize Assumptions | Evaluate Arguments | Draw Conclusions | |
Total EI |
-.05 | .03 | -.25 | .02 |
Self-Perception Composite |
-.10 | .02 | -.23 | -.06 |
Self-Regard |
-.06 | .10 | -.16 | -.11 |
Self-Actualization |
-.07 | .00 | -.20 | -.01 |
Emotional Self-Awareness |
-.14 | -.09 | -.24 | -.04 |
Self-Expression Composite |
-.02 | .06 | -.17 | -.01 |
Emotional Expression |
-.07 | -.03 | -.12 | -.02 |
Assertiveness |
-.07 | .03 | -.18 | -.06 |
Independence |
.09 | .15 | -.10 | .06 |
Interpersonal Composite |
-.13 | -.08 | -.25 | -.01 |
Interpersonal Relationships |
-.12 | -.04 | -.22 | -.06 |
Empathy |
-.09 | -.05 | -.23 | .02 |
Social Responsibility |
-.10 | -.12 | -.16 | .04 |
Decision Making Composite |
.03 | .08 | -.17 | .08 |
Problem Solving |
.10 | .16 | -.19 | .13 |
Reality Testing |
-.05 | .00 | -.26 | .06 |
Impulse Control |
.04 | .04 | .03 | .01 |
Stress Management Composite |
.03 | .07 | -.23 | .11 |
Flexibility |
-.04 | .02 | -.25 | .05 |
Stress Tolerance |
.15 | .14 | -.13 | .22 |
Optimism |
-.06 | .01 | -.19 | -.01 |
Happiness |
-.05 | .04 | -.13 | -.05 |
Note. N = 102. Correlations of .19 and above are significant at p < .05, correlations of .25 and above are significant at p < .01. Guidelines for evaluating r are .10 = small, .30 = medium, .50 = large.