Part II: Administering a Self-Report EQ-i 2.0
Planning the EQ-i 2.0 Assessment Process
Step 4: Clarifying Deliverables/Contracting
The phrase “get it in writing” reminds us of the value of a written agreement because an agreement outlines the working parameters and expected conditions in a given relationship. Engaging a client in the EQ-i 2.0 process requires much of the same up-front contracting and in fact, when done properly can actually help you avoid many of the confidentiality issues (e.g., who owns the data?) or common misuses of the EQ-i 2.0 that tend to arise later in the administration process.
By incorporating , the following elements in your contract you can avoid unmet expectations around the purpose of your partnership with a client (Block, 2000). These elements have been adapted to suit a typical organizational level EQ-i 2.0 consulting initiative, although the elements are still applicable to contracts/binding conversations with a single client.
- Boundary Analysis
- Project Objectives
- The Kind of Information You Seek
- Your Role
- The Product You Will Deliver
- Support and Involvement Required
- Time Schedule
- Confidentiality
Each of the eight contracting elements have been outlined further in the following table. Notice how much of the information you need to complete each element has already been gathered through the previous steps in the EQ-i 2.0 Engagement Process.
Table 4.3. Contracting Elements
Contract Element Description | Refer to Information Collected in the Client Engagement Process | Example | |
---|---|---|---|
1. Boundaries of Analysis |
|||
|
STEP 1. Investigate Underlying Needs |
“The EQ-i 2.0 will be administered to all High potential managers enrolled in Leadership 101. A full day of training content will be devoted to learning EI competencies and managers will receive a one hour debrief of their results with an external coach. The EQ-i 2.0 acts as an integral and ongoing assessment that HR wished to offer High Potentials for their personal growth and development.” | |
2. Objectives of Project |
|||
|
STEP 2. Communicating Value of the EQ-i 2.0 |
“The main objective is to provide all high potentials with: A common language§ Insight into their emotional and social functioning§ Data to drive their personal goal setting throughout their training program.” A second objective is to pilot the EQ-i 2.0 within the organization. Feedback and post-assessment follow-up will be collected to determine whether the EQ-i 2.0 can be used with other teams in the company.” | |
3. The Kind of Information You Seek |
|||
|
STEP 1. Investigate Underlying Needs |
“To complete the project I need access to all 12 high potentials, the training manager and the HR manager. I will also need to work with the existing training materials and content in order to build one day of EI content. I will also need access to all participants and their managers for 1 hour each following the program to evaluate success.” |
|
4. Your Role |
|||
|
STEP 1. Investigate Underlying Needs |
“My role is to manage the project from my consulting practice perspective. I will oversee the project and work closely with the internal project champion (HR Manager X). The actual delivery of the EI training program and coaching hours will be completed by my training facilitator Mr. Smith. | |
5. The Product You Will Deliver |
|||
|
STEP 2. Communicating Value of the EQ-i 2.0 |
“The products include:
|
|
6. Support and Involvement Required |
|||
|
STEP 1. STEP 2. STEP 3. |
“I will need all 12 high potentials to complete the EQ-i 2.0, which takes about 30 minutes. Managers will need to allow for this. I need internal support to allow the high potentials to not only attend the EI training but to practice the concepts back on the job… The time commitment expected of participants is X over a 3 month period.” | |
7. Time Schedule |
|||
|
STEP 1. Communicating Value of the EQ-i 2.0 and STEP 2. Gaining Buy-In |
“The proposed schedule:
|
|
8. Confidentiality |
|||
|
STEP 1. Investigate Underlying Needsand STEP 2. Communicating Value of the EQ-i 2.0 and STEP 3. Gaining Buy-In |
“Understanding that EQ-i 2.0 results and reports are owned by the participants alone, there will be no expectations for the participants to share their results. Each participant will receive their report and data will be housed in the secure database of the test provider (MHS). There needs to be strong internal championing of this process, but it is not mandatory for participants to complete the EQ-i 2.0.” |